http://blog.webfoot.com/2006/05/21/to-do-manager/ Wed, 18 Nov 2009 14:52:27 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 http://blog.webfoot.com/2006/05/21/to-do-manager/comment-page-1/#comment-154 Best Webfoot Forward » Google sowing seeds of own self-destruction Sat, 26 May 2007 18:34:30 +0000 http://www.webfoot.com/blog/2006/05/21/to-do-manager/#comment-154 [...] a to-do list manager [...] [...] a to-do list manager [...]

]]> http://blog.webfoot.com/2006/05/21/to-do-manager/comment-page-1/#comment-153 Best Webfoot Forward » Dreaming in Code Tue, 23 Jan 2007 05:57:54 +0000 http://www.webfoot.com/blog/2006/05/21/to-do-manager/#comment-153 [...] I have said before that current to-do list managers suck rocks, and email clients could be much better. Chandler in the Grand Vision would have / could have addressed those. However, we found out very early on that people didn’t care about to-do managers or email clients: in 2003, people’s pain was centered around calendaring: you really had to buy Outlook and run an Exchange server to get halfway decent one, and even Outlook was only halfway decent. There was not a way at the time for a small business or non-profit without an IT staff to coordinate calendars. Period. So we focused on calendaring, which IMHO was the least exciting and revolutionary part of Chandler. [...] [...] I have said before that current to-do list managers suck rocks, and email clients could be much better. Chandler in the Grand Vision would have / could have addressed those. However, we found out very early on that people didn’t care about to-do managers or email clients: in 2003, people’s pain was centered around calendaring: you really had to buy Outlook and run an Exchange server to get halfway decent one, and even Outlook was only halfway decent. There was not a way at the time for a small business or non-profit without an IT staff to coordinate calendars. Period. So we focused on calendaring, which IMHO was the least exciting and revolutionary part of Chandler. [...]

]]>